Language selector

Search results

Search results

  1. Chief Commissioner statement

    From: Public interest inquiry into racial profiling and racial discrimination by the Toronto Police Service

    Introduction

    I am here today to speak to all Ontarians about an issue that is undermining public trust in law enforcement — namely racial profiling and racial discrimination.
     
    Despite the immense pain and suffering it has caused, discrimination in policing has been allowed to continue for decades. 
     
    It is simply unacceptable that people who were racially profiled in their youth have to warn their grandchildren about it. 
     
  2. Section 31 Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19

    From: Public interest inquiry into racial profiling and racial discrimination by the Toronto Police Service

    Inquiries

    31 (1) The Commission may conduct an inquiry under this section for the purpose of carrying out its functions under this Act if the Commission believes it is in the public interest to do so.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

    Conduct of inquiry

    (2) An inquiry may be conducted under this section by any person who is appointed by the Commission to carry out inquiries under this section.  2006, c. 30, s. 4.

    Production of certificate

  3. Public interest inquiry into racial profiling and racial discrimination by the Toronto Police Service

    November 30, 2017 - the Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) announced that it has launched a public interest inquiry into racial profiling and racial discrimination by the Toronto Police Service (TPS). Using its legislated inquiry powers under section 31 of Ontario’s Human Rights Code, the OHRC has called for the TPS, the Toronto Police Services Board (TPSB) and the Special Investigations Unit to provide a wide range of data to determine exactly how and where racial profiling operates in law enforcement.

  4. Re: Development of a new accessibility standard for education

    November 17, 2017 - I am writing today regarding the government’s commitment to develop a new accessibility standard for education in Ontario. Regulatory standards are an effective way to address specific accessibility barriers and compliment the aim of Ontario’s Human Rights Code. Standards need to align with legal obligations under the Code and with the interpretive policies of the Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC).

  5. Inaugural community engagement summit inspires participants and brings new perspectives to the OHRC’s work

    November 10, 2017

    Toronto - At the first-ever OHRC Community Advisory Group Summit, on November 8 and 9, 2017, approximately 50 representatives from various communities across Ontario offered their expertise, lived experience and creativity to help the OHRC create a sustainable and transparent approach to community engagement.

  6. Safer Ontario Act is a foundation to rebuild trust in law enforcement

    November 9, 2017

    In conversations about criminal justice reform, it has become cliché for leaders to conclude that sustainable solutions lie in “rebuilding trust.” And for good reason. A September 2017 poll found that six in 10 Torontonians would “be scared” if they were “pulled over by a police officer for no apparent reason.” When speaking to the introduction of the Safer Ontario Act, Attorney General Yasir Naqvi said the legislation will rebuild trust. But will it?

  7. Community Advisory Group

    From: About the Commission

    The OHRC has created a Community Advisory Group to provide ongoing ideas and advice as we work to meet our strategic priorities: embodying human rights through reconciliation, enforcing human rights in the criminal justice system, advancing human rights by addressing poverty, and promoting a human rights culture through education. This group was set up to begin – and in many cases to continue – an ongoing, meaningful conversation between the OHRC and the many communities we serve. The conversation is about collaboration, partnerships and mutual support.

Pages